There is one benefit from an Obama victory and the Democrats maintaining control of Congress. No more Countdown with Keith Olbermann. He won't have any material.

The liberal media love to keep the focus on Sarah Palin's supposed lack of preparedness for the position of Vice President. It diverts attention from the fact that their favored candidate, Barack Obama, is less prepared. And he's running for the office of President.

This is what Bob Beckel, a Democratic Strategist, called Sarah Palin in a post on The Fox Forum: a "...lightweight, egomaniacal, narcissistic, emotionless hack from Alaska who doesn’t know the meaning of honor or honesty..." Sounds like she's getting under his skin.

Have you noticed that by the time a presidential election rolls around there is very little difference in what the major party candidates are saying? Apparently they move toward one another because they're risk averse. They can't resist adopting their opponent's positions that seem to be playing well.

If Obama believes that "we need fundamental change in this country" doesn't that mean that he thinks this country has fundamental flaws? I've never thought of this country as fundamentally flawed. Have you?

A couple of times now I've heard Obama say essentially this: "If McCain learns that I once shared my toys with a kindergarten friend he'll probably try to use that to prove that I'm a socialist." McCain should come back with this: "No Barack, socialism is more like when you force another kid to share his toys with your friend and you keep all your toys to yourself."

What does it say about a political party that relies so strongly on young, less-informed voters?